The soloution to all your relationship problems
Women
| problem | solution |
|---|---|
| He leaves the toilet seat up | date women |
| Not enough foreplay | date women |
| He never wants to go shopping with me | date women |
| He spends more time watching football than appreciating me | date women |
| We can never find anything to talk about | date women |
| He can't find my clitoris | date women |
Men
| problem | solution |
|---|---|
| She wants me to stay awake after sex | Go gay |
| She hates all my date ideas | Go gay |
| I can't tell if she's faking orgasm | Go gay |
| I get dumped for "not being romantic enough" | Go gay |
| She wants children | Go gay |
| She won't try anal with me | Guess td> |
All these people go on about Heterosexuality being the "right" and "normal" way because heterosexual unions are blessed with children. Firstly, Blessed is not the word you are looking for; try cursed, burdened or fraught. Secondly, I would consider a healthy, meaningful relationship with a partner who understands you the primary goal of anyone's life. Making homosexuality the normal, functional, right way to go. Children are like the punishment you get for falling off the ladder. Okay, girls, you have strong biological needs and all. Fuck a guy once. Then, bring up your lovely child with a caring and understanding person you love, rather than the father. It's not fantastic in evolutionary terms, but emotionally, 20/20. Okay, some guys have biological needs too, but half of the time, those are "I want children I don't have to look after" urges; see above. Otherwise, these men can be our heterosexual minorities. They're probably girly enough to form meaningful relationships with some women. Or, have an "if it's a boy, I'll take it. If it's a girl, you keep it." plan with some lesbians. Whatever.
The reason our society is not totally gay is likely at least partly the fault of unimaginative and otherwise dysfunctional women who just sit there doing what everyone thinks is normal and miss out of the epiphany I had when I was twelve: "Why don't I just be gay?". Post that, it's also the fault of men who don't like the thought of taking cock. Let's put it this way: not only is that one of the main reasons I'm gay, but additionally, I would consider not being disgusted at the thought of being penetrated a psychological disorder. Men and women. I know few would agree with me, but that's just because they're not me, and therefore fucked up.
On the simplest level; from a permanent point of view, women are better. Men and women alike agree that women are much hotter: the boobies, the zero chance of her fucking you, the slender limbs and nice hair etc. From a less than permanent point of view, men have better personalities. They control, think rationally and stand up for themselves appropriately. Women have the capability to do all these things, but somehow, by the second year of high school, they just think "fuck it. I'll just be a worthless slag." Women who sit around and complain about how men love them only for their bodies are idiots. Dears, men love you only for your bodies because that's all you have. No-one is going to love you for being you until You stops being a defeatist, puerile, generic little girl with no interests that can't be bought. To be born a woman is the greatest honour you can receive, yet so many people fuck it up. The ONLY downside to being a woman is the lower IQ. You may be interested to know that this averages at a difference of less than four points. FOUR. Do people boast their IQ of 104? Nope. Someone in whatever new scientist article I got that figure from suggested women don't do as well as men because of the IQ difference. An IQ difference of four is not noticeable at an interview; certinately not as noticeable as the kind of tangible stupidity that fathered that remark.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home